Shapeism

dinasset · **Posted:** Wed Feb 17, 2016 2:20 pm **(#1)**

David,
is there ANY chance to see a (sensible) performance improvement on G'MIC Shapeism?
Or should the "normal" user continue limiting experiments on very small images (sizes w+h<=1500)?
Thanks

Souphead · **Joined:** Dec 19, 2015 **Posts:** 46

Shapeism's speed isr related to the number of scales - that is the number of different sized shapes used. If six sizes of shape looks little different from 12 sizes of shape, six will be faster. Is that any help?

Souphead.

lylejk · **Joined:** Sep 24, 2010 **Posts:** 12831

lol

Sorry Diego; I've had a lot of correspondence and threads related to your request and it just brought about a lot of memories. As I mentioned before, patience, grasshopper, patience.

dinasset · **Posted:** Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:46 am **(#4)**

Thanks Souphead, I prepare a version (faster) which will use 3 instead of 7 shape different sizes.

Thanks Lyle for the info: spes ultima dea